My thoughts about movies and TV shows I've been watching

See also my blog on books: Elliot's Reading
Showing posts with label Wenders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wenders. Show all posts

Sunday, September 4, 2022

Varda by Agnes, Lesotho film, Black Bird, Buena Vista Social Club, Belfast, 4 Months 3 Weeks 2 Days, Thirteen Lives Las Year at Marienbad

 Elliot’s Watching - August 2022


All fans of the work of Agnes Varda - which should mean anyone really interested in European cinema of the past 70 years - should take the time to watch her final film, Varda by Agnes (2019). It’s a tour of (most of) her best films with live narration from Varda herself, addressing various groups of students and filmmakers. She concentrates on her works from late career, with hardly a mention of her earlier, somewhat more conventional films such as her real-time drama Cleo from 5 to 7 or her landmark feminist work One Sings, the Other doesn’t, nor does she dwell on any collaborations with her late husband, Jacques Demy. Rather, these late-career works are more like experiments in participatory, public art - one that describes her work style and her innovation (use of found objects to mark time and space) The Gleaners and I or her harrowing film about the life of an outsider (Vagabond) or the particularly imaginative film Faces, Places, in which she collaborates with an artist, JR, to visit various sites in France to shoot and display a photograph that captures the essence of the community, for example a shot of an enormous baguette sandwich that the villagers eat side by side (if I remember correctly). Her outreach to her subject is touching and inspiring, as is her focus on the marginal and the marginalized. Varda by Agnes should function as an open door to her other films rather than has a summary of her life’s work. A final note: Those lucky enough to watch the film on the Criterion Channel should check some of the commentary, notably the memories of Varda shared at the Telluride Festival, with panelists including her two adult children and her fan and friend Martin Scorsese.  



Lesotho (South Africa) is the setting for the unusual and entirely captivating film from the Lesotho filmmaker Lemohang Jeremiah Mosese, This Is not a Burial, It’s a Resurrection (2019). The film merits at least one revisit, as much of it is obscure on the literal level on a first viewing, at least my first viewing, but any obscurities or ambiguities are outweighed by the mysterious beauty of the setting and the community. The plot such as it is, in essence, centers on an octogenarian woman, Mantoa, played by Mary Twala Mhlongo, a well-known Lesotho actor (who died shortly after this film was completed) who anticipates a visit from her son working the SA gold mines, but instead receives word that he has died (we learn nothing more about his death), the latest in a long line or tragedies and losses she has suffered in her small, remote village. Over the course of the film she prepares herself and other villagers for her death - and for her burial in the small family or community cemetery - with this catch: the SA government plans to flood the entire village (and relocate the villagers) as part of a massive dam project; of course Mantoa organizes resistance to the project, with devastating results. What keeps the film alive is the sense of place and setting, the unusual cinematography, and terrific music both from the villagers and from highly dissonant score from Y Miyashita - it’s pretty much unlike any other film you’re likely to see. 


The American miniseries developed by David E. Kelley and Melissa James Gibson - which strangely is set in London and seems entirely British, who knew? - Anatomy of a Scandal (2022; based on a Sarah Vaughan novel) is worth seeing just to watch the courtroom drama, as the completely despicable MP James Whitehouse (our RI Senator oughta sue!), played by Rupert Friend, endures days in the dock after he’s accused of raping a much younger aide. It’s a he said/she said, which, unfortunately for James requires that he fess up to a 5-month consensual affair, and his lovely wife, played by Sienna Miller, endures the whole ordeal - and gives hubby some much-deserved grief after each court session. The series is engrossing, up to a point - as we watch the smarmy, self-satisfied James get skewered, but unfortunately the writers were stuck with a crappy plot that runs out of gas by about the half-way point and, if you keep watching (which we did) you’ll see one of the most ridiculous and preposterous resolutions (no spoilers) I’ve ever seen in an otherwise reasonably good crime/courtroom drama. Caveat emptor. 


Dennis Lehane’s Black Bird miniseries (2022, Apple) is one of the most successful dramatizations “based on a true story”- terrific and harrowing look at the life of a 20-something straight-arrow seeming guy (Taron Egerton as James Keene), nabbed as an Rx dealer and sentenced to 6 years - but the FBI makes him an offer: They will have his sentence commuted if he’ll go undercover into the prison for the “criminally insane” to get info and and wrench a information from a scary guy (Paul Walter Hauser as Larry Hall) who’s in jail for the murder of a young woman - and he’s suspected of killing about 20 other young women, whose bodies had never been found, leaving their families in grief. The series gives a brutal and uncompromising account of life in that Midwest prison, including various gangs inside the prison and a corrupt guard and the fear that at any moment Keene will be identified as an FBI plan (and the son of a retired police officer (Ray Liotta, in his final film). The series is tense all the way through - right to the final credits. 


Wim Wenders’s music-documentary Buena Vista Social Club (1999) is a totally enjoyable start to finish look at Cuban music - a project that began when the great American guitarist Ry Cooder, who’s been for many years a proponent of world music, travels to Cuba to try to connect with the great stars of traditional Cuban dance music, much of which had been performed by members of the eponymous club. Cooder soon learns that the club itself has long since passed away, but he and his team assiduously track down many of the great Cuban performers - men and women who at that time, inter 70s or older, had largely given up performing. Cooder et al brought these performers into an impromptu studio, recorded their work, and released a hugely successful compilation disk in the late ‘90s. Wenders joined the project and did on-camera interviews w/most of the singers - plus many fascinating location shots in Havana: worth seeing for the old American cars and the weathered grand boulevards and back by-ways - as well as the musicians themselves. The project culminated in a great concert in Amsterdam and then a find, triumphant performance before an enthusiastic crowd at Carnegie Hall. Totally fun for the great music and the strong, quirky personalities of the many artists. 



Stanley Donen’s spy-caper film Arabesque (1966, based on a novel by Gordon Cotlar) ) broke no new ground - familiar femme fatale plot with lots of twists - low-income Uni prof Gregory Peck, American England is called upon for his expertise in ancient languages to translate a small piece of parchment that for some reason has become of great interest to the PM of an Arab nation and a weird crime syndicate - don’t even try to follow the plot because who cares anyway?, it’s all about the exciting and imaginative chases (through Regents Park zoo, and aquarium, chases on horseback, pursued by a chopper, at the Ascot races, buildings blown up and demolished, Peck drugged and stumbling at night through English traffic, and more! - plus Sophia Loren in a sexy/comic/secret-agent role. Lot’s of fun - filmgoers in the 60s got the money’s worth even if, in the end, it amounts to not much but a Hitcirhcock homage: right down to the scene in which Peck and Loren are pursed by a harvester in a field of grain (North by Northwest anyone?) and, in Hitchcock fashion, the bit of cypher turns out to be a bit of nothing - just the “maguffin”that sets this madcap romp romping. Lots of fun; zero depth. 


Kenneth Branagh’s film Belfast (2021) is a portrait of the then-troubled city in the 1960s (with some framing shots of a Belfast as a peaceable, bustling city today) as experienced by a young boy - obviously a depiction of Branagh in his childhood - in a Protestant family living in the midst of the struggles; the film opens w/ a frightening street riot aimed at driving newly arrived Catholic families from the neighborhood. Some of the film is idyllic, as the young protagonist enjoys a life of close family ties - esp to the older generation - w/ lots of Irish humor, and much of the adolescent struggle (a crush on a classmate, whom we later learn is from a Catholic family) plus pressures on the family itself, of which the young boy is beginning to get a glimpse and a dawning appreciation, brought on by the father’s gambling habits and need for a more stable, unthreatened life - notably a move to London, which of course upsets the young boy deeply. There’s a lot of humor, much pathos, lots of street fighting and thuggish bullying of those - including the boy’s father - who refuse to take up arms - plus a good musical track with some fine selections from Van Morrison. Though the film ends with some sanctimonious moments, it’s overall a fine work that depicts a difficult childhood predictive of a culturally rich career in the arts - cf 400 Blows or Cinema Paradiso; will there be a sequel? 


But not for me … two completely different series about workplace culture: Industry, about a cohort of new temporary hires at a highly aggressive financial-services company, all vying to be retained come RIF (reduction in force) day, but (most of) the cohort are dislikable or amoral or both and there’s way too much totally gratuitous sex, drinking, smoking - without the counterweight of strong characters, interesting relationships, crises and resolutions. Ditto the much-praised surreal and enigmatic workplace of Severance, which for me was just far too creepy and arbitrary and I probably didn’t give it enough of a chance (2 episodes) but why would I want to visit by evening the fears of my nights? 



Catching up on recent watching of two productions, first the Skye Borgman’s 2022 3-part series, I Just Killed My Dad, is a good program (Netflix) for those like me who are true-crime buffs, and this has a twist in that it opens with the confession that you can see in the title - a young man calling the police to report on his own actions - and it seems the young man gets terrible treatment as ;aw enforcement assume thesis a murder or at least manslaughter face that they have to pin on the kid - but over the course of the drama we see how horrendously he was treated by his father and the misery of his life of near torture and of course we recognize before the cops and the DA’s team do that this kid is guilty of nothing. No spoilers. Second, I re-watched the terrific Romanian 2007 film 4 months, 3 weeks, 2 days from Cristian Mungiu - and it’s a film everyone in an abortion-banning state should be forced to watch’ over the 2 hours or so, through a series of mostly long stills, and sometimes long tracking shots in which Mungiu conveys the struggle over few days of two college roommates in Romania, w/ its ridiculously strict anti-abortion laws (couldn’t happen here, could it?), and compromise, the suffering, the expense, the humiliation, the fear these 2 women brave together because of their friendship and commitment to women’s rights. The writing is wise and insightful, and the star s Anamaria Marinca as the fearless loyal friend. Topical, I’m sad to say, and enduring drama. 


Prolific, polished professional Ron Howard, who’s done about a movie a year, almost all of them big-budget and highly successful, since 1982, despite some wavering reviews comes through once more with the dramatic and technically challenging Thirteen Lives (2022), based (closely) on the rescue of 12 Thai kids and their soccer coach from a flooded dave in mountainous Thailand. Though most viewers will be familiar with the rescue, which received much international daily coverage, it still takes your breath to watch the rescue team in action against all odds and expectations. It had to be a huge technical challenge to do this film - many complex crowd scenes, re-creation of the terrifying mountain cave, re-enactment of the treacherous rescue process - you’ve with them all the way what seems an impossible task. If there’s a flaw to the movie it would be that no central character emerges - though that would be the “Hollywood” way the group effort with no individual hero is in keeping w/ the facts so, so be it. Also unfortunate - the Thai Seal rescue team and other local experts seem shunted aside and dependent on the expertise of a few British amateurs - a patronizing structure and not in keeping with current screen mores - but that’s the way it played out, and I think Howard and his team would have been lambasted had they restructured to story include a Thai hero, so more credit to them for staying with the facts of the docudrama. 



Yes, it’s pretentious; yes, it’s enigmatic; yes, it’s preposterous; yes, it’s French - but Alain Resnais’s Last Year at Marienbad (1961), screenplay by the equally pretentious/French Alain Robbe-Grillet - and yet, it’s still worth watching for pure weirdness. YOLO. The film - in which to my knowledge none of the characters have names - takes place in what looks to be one of the great chateaus now a grand hotel at the eponymous resort/recovery clinic; the characters wander through the innumerable long hallways and ballrooms, sometimes engaging in small gambling, at one point seeming to watch a play about the movie in which they’re participating, who knows? The story line such as it is involves a man who seems a woman whom he recognizes reminds her of their affair (her hawkish husband plays some kind of gambling or card trick on many of the guests) that began a year ago at this very hotel - and the woman insists that no, it never happened, she has no such recollection. So who’s right in this? What kind of sense does it all make? To me, not much - still fun to wander through these over-the-top decor - 2nd empire style? - and to walk in the garden that is done in extreme French style with all the greenery cut into rigid geometric patterns that look nothing like nature, guided throughout by dissonant organ music (I think that for a few moments some stringed instruments join in?). Obviously a lot of commentary exists on this sometimes incomprehensible film and maybe some of it will clarify Resnais’s intention, aside from bafflement, but many films that were startling and evocative in their time today look like curiosities - Godard and Truffault drove a stake into the heart this type of moody, languorous film with their new-wave cinema built upon by psychology, memoir, character, engagement, history, style, and commitment. 

Thursday, September 3, 2020

A documentary this helps us understand the work of Wim Wenders

 Wim Wenders's documentary Tokyo-ga (1985, within a year of the completion of Paris, Texas) is a curiosity. Wenders explains in his voiceover narration that he undertook this project - a filmed record of his visit to Japan - as a tribute to one of his favorite filmmakers, Ozu; that in itself was to me a surprise. Not that Ozu wouldn't be on anyone's list of the greatest filmmakers of the century, but it's hard to see any direct connection between the work of these 2 directors. In fact, Ozu seems in most ways the antithesis to Wenders: his films are strongly driven by character and plot; though visually interesting, they are only rarely visually arresting; in methodology, Ozu is known for his complete control of the shoot, built upon extraordinary elaborate planning ahead of time, allowing little leeway for the DP, lots of stills and long shots, almost no tracking ever. As to Wenders - think the exact opposite of everything I just said about Ozu. That said, however, WW's film is a quirky and odd look at Japan as he searches for images and oddities, so we get extensive looks at pachinko, arcade games, a workshop where they manufacture waxed-images of food for display us in restaurants, a lot of time w/ a group of young Japanese who gather in a park to listen and dance to American early R&B, and some long takes of the elaborate patterns of Japanese railroad tracks (here is something that WW does share w/ Ozu). All these make the film worth watching and help us understand WW's narrative films, even though I think this travelog/documentary  won't shed much light on Ozu (other than an long interview w/ his long-time cameraman, who bursts into tears at the end of the take and asks to be left alone). At the outset, WW shows some clips of Ozu's greatest work, Tokyo Story (in particular some views of the home town of the father several hours from Tokyo), and I'm surprised WW didn't counter these w/ shots of the same locales in 1985; you can look online and see how these scenes have changed over time - when I first did so, I gasped. 

Monday, August 24, 2020

 Wim Wenders's 1984 film - Paris, Texas - brings together a good team of actors (notably Henry Dean Stanton and Dean Stockwell), a great musical score (Ry Cooder!), fantastic cinematography (Robbie Muller - I don't know anything about him), a intelligent and mysterious screenplay (Sam Shepard), and most of all WW's sensibility as a director. Every scene, every frame is like a work of art - no coincidence I guess that I've just read a news item about Gregory Crewdson, who makes terrific photographs staging and designing each one as if it were a movie still; his work and sensibility recalls WW's work. This film brings WW to a new setting for him, and it's obvious how much he's intrigued by the variety of visual landscapes in the SW (and to a degree in LA): ranging from the terrific opening sequence in an arid desert landscape, and then encompassing weird roadside restaurants and motels, then the car-choked streets in the American urbaneia - so many visually memorable moments for this ever-curious director and his team. Is it a great movie, though? Maybe not quite. The story, in essence, is that Stockwell's brother Travis (Stanton) has been missing for 4 years when he suddenly is found at a tiny and sort of scary medical clinic; older bro Walt (Stockwell) leaves LA to bring his brother back to civilization and to the family (he'd left his wife and newborn, Hunter, who has been raised since childhood by Walt and wife, Anne). Good plot set-up - but the plot development strains credibility almost to a laughable extent - probably intentional (for ex., Walt finds his runaway brother just by driving aimlessly on some Texas backroads; similarly, Travis and Hunter, trying to find H's mother, improbably track her down at a bank and follow her through a maze of Houston traffic). OK, so Wenders isn't a director we go to for logical and well-designed plots; the movie also challenges us, however, w/ Travis's almost miraculous awakening as a character, and we never really get a good explanation of what happened to him during his years of exile nor why, initially, he seems so traumatized. All that said, the conclusion is warm and affecting and, thanks to all the other strengths of the film, worth waiting through occasional languor and obscurity. 

Monday, June 3, 2019

A potentially criminal act or a an act of mercy: Alice in the Cities

Wim Wenders's 1974 film, Alice in the Cities, is a fine travel movie in a mode that feels familiar in some ways - in fact, it was so much like another 1974 film, Paper Moon, that Wenders almost abandoned the project - but has a style of its own. The plot, such as is, involves a 31-year-old freelance journalist from Germany traveling in the U.S. to write a travel essay commissioned by a mag.; his research is getting him nowhere, although he's taking many Polaroid photos that he hopes to use in his writing (scribbling in a notebook, as one character notes). His agent/editor pretty much dumps him because he's oblivious to his deadline, and he prepares to fly home from NYC, but the flight is canceled. He provides some help (which leads to a one-night stand) to a German woman he meets at the terminal: She speaks little English, and is traveling w/ her 10-year-old daughter (Alice). Long and short, when he prepares to fly home the next day, the woman has left him a note asking him to be responsible for Alice - the mom has some relationship business to resolve w/ her ex. - on the flight and until she can get to Europe. So the man takes Alice to Amsterdam, rents a hotel room near the airport - of course the mother never arrives, which leads to an odyssey in Holland and then in Germany as they try in vain to find Alice's grandmother (all they have to go on is a photo of the grandmother's house). The plot feels not only improbable - who would leave a child to a stranger like that? Why would he take this young girl on an odyssey across Germany, how could he not perceive that he is likely to be arrested for kidnapping or even on a morals charge? And of course his  behavior seems even creepier today: What 45 years ago may have seemed like an amusing jaunt during which Alice and the man bond, today seems even creepier: Who won't cringe at the scene of him in the bathtub while Alice sits on the toilet seat, conversing w/ him? And other such moments. All that said, we do feel an attachment to Alice and even a sympathy for the poor man and his tender, protective relationship w/ this child. All his mistakes seem to be out of clumsiness and obliviousness, and what appears from the outside to be a potentially criminal act we see, from the inside, as an act of goodness and mercy, even if misguided. The end is puzzling in many ways, which I won't discuss here or give away, but will lead to much head-scratching I'd think. This film is like a prelude to WW's next, Wrong Move, with the same lead actor, once again an aspiring writer on a journey of discovery - although Alice, in which the dialog was created on the scene (Wrong Move held tightly to the Handke script), feels much more free and open and less pretentious. (Careful viewers will see WW appear in the film and to have his name come up in an amusing manner.)

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Wim Wenders film that today looks pretentious and obscure

Wim Wenders's 1975 film, Wrong Move, seems to be a German-language follow-up, a decade behind its time?, to the Italian-French-Spanish new wave cinema - a story about a mysterious journey in which the protagonist and others he meets on his travels discuss in oblique conversation and in disconnected dialog issues of life, fate, politics, history, and art. What worked well, however, in earlier films - such as Breathless, 8 1/2, Discrete Charm, et al seems overwrought and pretentious here. The script by famously dire Austrian playwright Peter Handke will not sound to anyone like recognizable human conversation in any language; apparently it's a 20th-century update of a Goethe novel  (Willhelm Meister)- but it still has to stand on its own to be worth watching; maybe it's worth watching once, out of curiosity, but it's be no means great or groundbreaking. Plot such as it is in rough outline involves a young man, Willhelm (in his 20s at most? - one would think he should be a teenager and played by one - definitely not by an actor in his 30s!) - who wants to "be a writer" and sets off on a journey to find his talent; the trip will take him from the German lowlands to its highest peak; in the process, W meets on a train and in a restaurant, several people who will accompany him: an elderly street musician (whom we learn had a past history as a Nazi officer - W later tries to kill the man, but backs off); his female sidekick (debut of Nastasha Kinsky), a mute, and decidedly untalented though beautiful; a would be poet who's clumsy and awkward and whose verse is morbid and juvenile; a beautiful actress who keeps coming on to W and whom he keeps rebuffing. They also meet a wealthy, suicidal man who puts them all up for a night - and in the a.m. they all discuss their dreams. Yawn. There's no great climax or insight, there's minimal action, and overall the film is neither emotive nor instructive - although I will say that some of the photography is quite beautiful, especially a long scene with long tracking shots as the characters ascend a mountain via a paved walkway; also, the score is dissonant and in keeping with the discordant dialogue and the many missed connections that the characters endure on their journey to nowhere.

Saturday, July 18, 2015

Genius at work: Documentary about our greatest living photographer (Salgado)

If I were to watch it again, which I might, I would watch the Wenders-Salgado documentary, The Salt of the Earth, on mute, as the movie is essentially an opportunity to see Sabastiao Salgado's amazing (mostly b/w) photography - grouped, in this film (and I think in his published books) into a few sections: Other Americans (early visit to Latin America), war photos, work, the Sahara (famine in Africa), displaced people (African wars), and finally nature (and anthropology, undisturbed tribes in the Amazon - near Salgado's home town). Virtually every image of Salgado's work is astonishing - the composition, the clarity, the capturing of emotion, the sympathy for the dispossessed and the grand sense of the forces of economics crushing individuals - particularly notable in his work on the gold mines of Brazil, which open the film. Wenders - himself an amazing cinematographer who, like Salgado, has brought us to many odd places - Siberia, Alaska (Grizzly Man), the cave paintings of Southern France, the Amazon (in his feature films) [[Note in 2020: Obviously I made a mistake here; Grizzly Man and Cave of Forgotten Dreams are films by Werner Herzog, not Wenders]] - gives us I think just enough info about Salgado and his working methods so as to inform but not obstruct Salgado's work and imagery. It was interesting to learn that he began his career as an economist, working mostly in 3rd World settings, which explains the ideas behind his many great projects. Also very important and eye-opening to see him at work: as we see the published photographs, so meticulous and precise, we never think about the incredible danger Salgado himself faced to get these images - the film lets us see that - or about the difficulty of capturing moving and evolving events of work and war into single, deeply expressive stills. There are a couple of sequences in which Wenders and Salgado's son (the co-director) film S. at work - although it's clear that in his later years he's not taking on the monumentally ambitious (and dangerous) projects of his youth - but how often to we get to see live footage of a genius at work? The film breaks no ground per se as a documentary or work of art in its own right, but it's a valuable and perhaps definitive account of the work of probably the greatest living photographer.